âI believe that anyone should be able to buy any weapon they want, any place, any time.â Composite gun-rights advocate.
After the Parkland, Fla., high school shooting on Feb. 14 Parkland students started a nation-wide movement calling for reasonable laws against gun violence. The âGun in every handâ folks think the students are wrong to be working for this cause. They have been up in arms (pun intended) against what they see as an encroachment on their right to own whatever weapons they want, in whatever quantity they choose.
If I could talk to these people, Iâd ask if they know what the second and third words of the Second Amendment are. Think about that for a moment; Iâll tell you later.
The âGun in every handâ folks see every law regarding gun ownership, no matter how reasonable, as some kind of assault on their Second Amendment rights. So reread the opening quote (which wasnât actually said by anyone) and then answer: Do you agree with this statement?
If not, if you donât think that just anybody, regardless of age, mental condition, criminal history, etc., should be able to buy any weapon they want, what restrictions would you place on buyers? Most people would say, âWell obviously, little children, terrorists, and other dangerous people shouldnât be able to buy a gun, and background checks would help prevent these people from purchasing weapons. There are also weapons no civilian should have.â
The moment someone says that, theyâre saying theyâre in favor of some kind of regulations on purchasers and weapons. After that, itâs just a question of determining which regulations are acceptable.
My personal opinion is that no one should be allowed to buy a gun until they have shown they know how to load, unload, clean, store, and actually shoot the gun. I donât think those requirements are unreasonable. Walking into a gun store and buying a gun and a box of bullets wonât make you or anyone else safer if you donât know what you are doing.
When I was in 8th grade, I lived in a small mountain town where people had guns and hunted. I had a classmate named Rita. When Rita was five, her father was cleaning his long gun. The gun went off and shot Rita in the spine. She became paralyzed, confined to a wheelchair.
Ritaâs father was not a âbad guy with a gun.â He didnât intend to shoot his daughter. But somehow, she got shot and suffered the consequences for the rest of her life.
I keep hearing âlaw-abidingâ and âresponsible gun ownersâ as justification for not requiring any kind of standards to buy, keep or use a gun. Several studies have shown that â85 percent of gun-owning parents did not practice safe gun storage and 72 percent believed their young children could differentiate a toy gun from a real gun.â (Rutgers.edu, 5/15/18) Should people that ignorant be allowed to have guns?
Last November, a local columnist wrote about how terrible liberals are for wanting common-sense gun laws. This same columnist then wrote that he made sure his children were âproficient with firearms.â Why would he put that restriction on his children? Iâm sure they are all law-abiding. According to the NRA, that appears to be the only condition needed. Requiring that people know how to use the guns they buy seems to be off-limits.
On April 14, pro-gun rallies were held across the U.S. One requirement for attendees was to bring their guns unloaded. If guns donât kill people, why couldnât participants bring loaded guns? Could it be that the organizers knew that sometimes bad things happen?
The âGun in every handâ proponents try to say the gun violence problem is mental heath, or violent video games and movies, or lack of respect for life. America doesnât have a monopoly on any of these problems. Every country has mentally ill people and video games and movies. But they donât have the constant stream of shootings we experience on a regular basis. This is a uniquely American problem. Why?
Pastor Thomas Dixon of Charleston, S.C. said, âGuns donât kill people. People who have no business with guns kill people.â For those who couldnât remember, the second and third words of the Second Amendment are âwell regulated.â Not everybody who wants a gun should be able to get whatever they want, any time, anywhere. Life is too precious to treat that way. Anyone who values life should be able to see that.
Jeanette Strong, whose column appears every other week, is a Nevada Press Association award-winning columnist. She may be reached at news@lahontanvalleynews.com.